The controversial dress code at sport’s biggest party – BBC Sport

Resting next to the Seine river, the Cite du Cinema is best known for film-making.

By July, though, its cavernous studio spaces will be refashioned into the heart of the athletes’ village for the Paris Olympics.

Athletes from all countries and cultures will be found at the dining hall sitting across from one another sharing meals and stories. It is a multi-cultural melting pot, in which people of all different creeds and colours meet every four years.

Yet the dress code for the hosts is different from their guests.

In September the International Olympic Committee (IOC) made clear that athletes in Paris can represent themselves and their faith, as well as their country.

“For the Olympic Village, the IOC rules apply,” an IOC spokesperson told Reuters.

“There are no restrictions on wearing the hijab or any other religious or cultural attire.”

The French team, though, have been told something different.

“The ban on the hijab [a type of headscarf that covers the head and neck, but leaves the face clear] is the consequence of two discriminations: it is islamophobia, but also gender discrimination,” says Veronica Noseda, who plays football for Les Degommeuses, a Parisian football club set up to fight discrimination.

Assile Toufaily, who moved to Lyon in 2021 having played football at international level for her native Lebanon, agrees.

“It’s not really about the French society, it’s the government,” she says.

“There is a hate on Muslim people during these last few years in France and it’s shown in sport.”

This summer and the arrival of the Olympics in Paris will be the clearest sporting demonstration of a distinctive and divisive French concept.

Liberte, egalite, fraternite, which first appeared during the French Revolution, may be the most famous expression of what France aspires to. It appears at the front of the constitution, on coins, on stamps and on public buildings.

Less famous, and harder to translate, is another key tenet of the French republic: laicite.

Most often translated as secularism in English, laicite does not stipulate that France’s people should drop any religious customs or symbols, but, instead, that state and public institutions should be expressly free of them.

It is an idea that is keenly contested in France, particularly in the wake of a raft of terrorist attacks over the past decade and a parallel resurgence in far-right politics.

French President Emmanuel Macron has found himself defining the term again and again.

“The problem isn’t laicite,” he said in a speech in October 2020.

“Laicite in the French Republic means the freedom to believe or not believe, the possibility of practising one’s religion as long as law and order is ensured.

“Laicite means the neutrality of the state. In no way does it mean the removal of religion from society and the public arena. A united France is cemented by laicite.”

A 2004 law attempted to add some clarity to the concept, banning “ostentatious” religious symbols from state schools, without naming specific examples.

While Sikh turbans, Jewish kippah and large Christian crucifixes have been interpreted as falling the wrong side of laicite, most of the debate has focused around head coverings among the largest Muslim population of any nation in Western Europe.

In September, French sports minister Amelie Oudea-Castera – a former professional tennis player who lost to Martina Hingis in the Wimbledon juniors semi-final in 1994 – confirmed that the French Olympic team, as an institution representing and funded by the French public, is bound by laicite.

“It means absolute neutrality in public services,” she said. “The France team will not wear the headscarf.”

Athletes from other nations will be free wear religious symbols in the Paris 2024 athletes’ village as they wish. However members of the French team, if they are to abide by their nation’s rules, can’t.

The stance has been criticised by some international bodies.

“Prohibitions on the wearing of religious headscarves in public spaces violate Muslim women’s rights,” added human rights charity Amnesty International.

In France however, the ban carries considerable support.

“It is a complicated and very, very sensitive issue,” says Sebastien Maillard, an associate fellow at think tank Chatham House who has reported on French politics and society for much of his career.

“When I moved from Paris to London, that was one of the main differences. In the United Kingdom religion is displayed quite comfortably, whereas in Paris it is often seen as something more provocative.”

Maillard points to another, smaller, controversy involving Paris 2024’s exclusion of religious symbols.

In March the Game’s official poster – a stylised image of Paris’ landmarks coming together to form a stadium – was unveiled.

The artist omitted the golden crucifix that stands on top of the Hotel des Invalides, sparking discussion as to how strictly the Games – which will the cost French taxpayers several billion euros – stick to the principles of laicite.

“The debate today more often focuses around a Muslim community, one that wants to be fully part of French society but also follow religion in its own way,” says Maillard. “We have this debate over and over about how that fits.

“The French republic was partly founded on a rejection of Catholicism and it feels threatened whenever religion impinges on it. There is a strong fear, particularly among older generations, of religion exerting influence over society and the state.”

The debate plays out in areas where those demographic differences are most pronounced – in education, but also sport.

During last year’s period of Ramadan – a month-long fast observed between sunrise and sunset by Muslims – the French Football Federation (FFF) sent out an edict to referees not to pause matches to allow players to break their fast, saying these interruptions “do not respect the provisions of the statutes of the FFF”.

This year, with Ramadan coinciding with an international break, the FFF confirmed that it would not alter the timing of meals and practices to accommodate Muslim players, effectively preventing them from fasting while in camp with France’s age-grade and senior teams.

Another talented prospect in another sport, basketball player Diaba Konate, who has represented France at under-23 level, has left for the United States, saying the ban on her wearing the hijab has left her “heartbroken”.

Even in low-level local matches, female Muslim players are usually banned from wearing a headscarf, on the basis that the leagues are organised and run by public bodies. Protective scrumcaps – a work-around solution some players have attempted – have also been deemed incompatible with the rules by some referees.

The application of laicite to sport’s grassroots means that hijab-wearing athletes have usually compromised or dropped out before reaching the biggest stage.

But this summer will set their dilemma in the starkest terms: choosing between wearing a national team kit at Paris 2024 and an expression of a personal faith.

Elsewhere in sport, expectations have changed.

Morocco defender Nouhaila Benzina made history at last summer’s Women’s Football World Cup.

Following Fifa’s 2014 rule change to allow the wearing of head coverings for religious reasons, she became the first person to wear a hijab at the World Cup when she took to the field against South Korea.

At Rio 2016, fencer Ibtihaj Muhammad made headlines when she became the first American to compete at the Olympics while wearing a headscarf. She was later one of the athletes used to launch a hijab made specifically for sport by a global American sports brand.

Another athlete to win a medal at those Games while wearing a head covering – Iran’s taekwondo player Kimia Alizadeh – has since emigrated to Germany, where she criticised the Iranian government’s policy of “compulsory hijab”.

She competed at the Tokyo Games in 2021 under the flag of the Refugee team and without a religious head covering.

Iqra Ismail can speak only for herself, with a perspective from across the Channel in the United Kingdom, where laicite is a foreign concept.

She is a director of Hilltop FC, the Female Refugee Football Project Coordinator at QPR Community Trust and a Muslim who has loved sport since she was a child.

“Wearing the hijab is a part of my identity. When it comes to playing, it’s not something that I’ll leave outside the lines of the pitch,” she says.

“Football is a human right – everyone should definitely have the right to participate in it.”

Yasmin Abukar is the founder of Sisterhood FC, a women’s Muslim football club in London.

“I was asking Muslim girls what made them stop playing football and the answers that they gave me were so sad to hear,” Abukar says of the inspiration behind the club.

“Half of them stopped because they felt like they didn’t belong. The other half felt like they didn’t have access to football in a way that will cater to their religious requirements.

“I wouldn’t know how I would feel as a young Muslim person being told by the government that I can’t have the freedom of practising my religion.

“I’m very thankful that my parents didn’t migrate to France.”