News Bulletin
Daily News Portal

English houses are more cramped than New York apartments

[ad_1]


By Rory Tingle, Home Affairs Correspondent For Mailonline

12:14 25 Mar 2024, updated 18:08 25 Mar 2024



People in England live in more cramped conditions than those in New York City apartments, a shocking new study revealed today. 

The Resolution Foundation found the average floor space per person in England is 38 square metres, compared to 43 in the New York metropolitan area. 

The corresponding figure for London is 33sqm compared to 31sqm for Paris, 43sqm for France, 33sqm for Tokyo, 40sqm for Japan and 66sqm for the US as a whole. 

The report also revealed that Finland is the only country in the OECD that spends more on housing than British workers as a proportion of total spending.

Yet despite paying more than other countries, they are getting less in return due to our ‘expensive and ageing’ housing stock. 

This New York City studio apartment may look small, but at just under 43sqm it is still provides more living space per person than the English average
This image shows a studio flat in Shoreditch that is 33sqm in size – the average amount of living space per person in London
The Resolution Foundation found the average floor space per person in England is 38 square metres, compared to 43 in the New York metropolitan area

The Foundation’s housing outlook used OCED data to compare the UK’s housing issues against other similar economies. 

READ MORE – Our street was sold to an offshore tax haven – now we’re trapped in our homes

England’s housing stock is also relatively old, with 38% of homes built before 1946, the report said, compared with around a fifth (21%) in Italy and one in nine (11%) in Spain.

Older homes can be poorly insulated, leading to higher energy bills and a higher risk of damp, according to the Foundation, which is focused on improving the living standards for those on low to middle incomes.

Researchers also considered what it would cost to rent all homes – incorporating what owners would pay if they rented their home at market rates – to show how the market price of housing varies across different countries.

The report said: ‘If all households in the UK were fully exposed to our housing market, they would have to devote 22% of their spending to housing services, far higher than the OECD average (17%), and the highest level across the developed economies with the solitary exception of Finland.’

The report also revealed that Finland is the only country in the OECD that spends more on housing than British workers as a proportion of total spending
Older homes can be poorly insulated, leading to higher energy bills and a higher risk of damp, according to the Foundation
Housing is more expensive in the UK compared to other OECD countries when taking into account each country’s overall price levels

Adam Corlett, principal economist at the Resolution Foundation, said: ‘Britain’s housing crisis is likely to be a big topic in the election campaign, as parties debate how to address the problems of high costs, poor quality and low security that face so many households.

READ MORE – Angry neighbours blast top developer Persimmon over quality of new-build housing estate where ‘driveways and gardens aren’t level’ and kitchens are so wonky cabinets seem to ‘levitate’

‘Britain is one of many countries apparently in the midst of a housing crisis, and it can be difficult to separate rhetoric from reality. 

‘But by looking at housing costs, floorspace and wider issues of quality, we find that the UK’s expensive, cramped and ageing housing stock offers the worst value for money of any advanced economy.

‘Britain’s housing crisis is decades in the making, with successive governments failing to build enough new homes and modernise our existing stock. That now has to change.’

Last month a report found just 250,000 homes were built last year across Great Britain against a target of 300,000.

Complex and unpredictable planning rules across the three nations are partly to blame for this, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said. 

The report heighted that many planning departments are under-resourced, some do not have up-to-date local plans, and do not have clear targets or strong incentives to deliver the numbers of homes needed in their area.

It also said shortfalls were linked to requirements to speak with a wide range of stakeholders.

The report looked at a series of indicators to determine the health of the UK housing market. In these graphs the UK as a whole is shown in purple and London in light blue

In addition, there were concerns over limitations to private speculative development, highlighting that developers often produce houses based on pricing rather than diversifying the types and numbers of homes they build to meet the needs of communities.

READ MORE – Why a generation of Brits will be locked out the housing market: Alarming figures reveal how first-time buyers need to save up for FIFTEEN years to get on the ladder in London

The report also found a rise in developers using estate management charges for facilities, such as roads, drainage and green spaces.

It said these charges are ‘often high and unclear to homeowners’ and flagged that some unplanned charges can cost thousands of pounds.

A Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities spokesperson said: ‘Housebuilding is a Government priority and despite global economic challenges we remain on track to meet the manifesto commitment of delivering one million homes this Parliament, and have introduced reforms to improve the planning system.

‘At the same time as increasing the quantity of homes we are driving up quality, with the number of non-decent homes down by two million since 2010.

‘Our landmark Renters Reform Bill is progressing through Parliament and will give tenants more security in their homes, while our £11.5 billion investment in the affordable homes Programme and £1.2 billion local authority housing fund will help build a new generation of affordable and social housing.’ 

A recent report from the Competition and Markets Authority showed how the UK is failing to meet housebuilding targets
Figures from Nationwide Building Society showing mortgage payments as as percentage of take home pay

[ad_2]

Read More:English houses are more cramped than New York apartments

Comments are closed.